<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 290 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371521</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the amounts as cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing satisfactory explanations for credited sums and highlighted the need for concrete evidence to support claims regarding the nature and source of income. The parties were directed to bear their respective costs, concluding the legal proceedings in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 290 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371521</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the amounts as cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing satisfactory explanations for credited sums and highlighted the need for concrete evidence to support claims regarding the nature and source of income. The parties were directed to bear their respective costs, concluding the legal proceedings in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>