<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 275 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371506</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, holding that no disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act was warranted as there was no exempt income earned during the assessment year. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that no disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) was justified as the employees&#039; contributions to PF/ESIC were deposited before the due date of filing the income tax return. The order was pronounced on 16/11/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 06:37:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 275 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371506</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, holding that no disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act was warranted as there was no exempt income earned during the assessment year. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that no disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) was justified as the employees&#039; contributions to PF/ESIC were deposited before the due date of filing the income tax return. The order was pronounced on 16/11/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>