<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 273 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR PROHIBITION OF BENAMI PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS ACT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371504</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders in all three appeals, releasing the attached properties. It found the appellants did not hold any benami property, determining the transactions were genuine salary advances. Procedural lapses by the Initiating Officer and Adjudicating Authority rendered the attachment orders invalid. The appeals were disposed of with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 273 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR PROHIBITION OF BENAMI PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS ACT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371504</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders in all three appeals, releasing the attached properties. It found the appellants did not hold any benami property, determining the transactions were genuine salary advances. Procedural lapses by the Initiating Officer and Adjudicating Authority rendered the attachment orders invalid. The appeals were disposed of with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>