<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 270 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371501</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow education sponsorship expenses, directing a fair hearing and a reasoned decision. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal, deeming the expenses personal. However, the ITAT remanded the issue for reconsideration. Regarding foreign traveling expenses, while the ITAT did not provide specific details, it can be inferred that the appeal was allowed, suggesting a favorable outcome for the appellant on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 06:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 270 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371501</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow education sponsorship expenses, directing a fair hearing and a reasoned decision. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal, deeming the expenses personal. However, the ITAT remanded the issue for reconsideration. Regarding foreign traveling expenses, while the ITAT did not provide specific details, it can be inferred that the appeal was allowed, suggesting a favorable outcome for the appellant on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>