<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 264 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371495</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that the demand for Service Tax, interest, and penalties was barred by limitation. The Tribunal found no evidence of suppression of facts or intent to evade tax by the appellant and referenced legal precedents to support its decision. The appeal was allowed on the grounds of limitation, and the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 06:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 264 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371495</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that the demand for Service Tax, interest, and penalties was barred by limitation. The Tribunal found no evidence of suppression of facts or intent to evade tax by the appellant and referenced legal precedents to support its decision. The appeal was allowed on the grounds of limitation, and the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>