<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 256 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371487</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that notional interest on a security deposit should not be added to the monthly rent for the purpose of service tax calculation on renting of immovable property. The lease agreement was executed before renting became a taxable service, and the fixed monthly rent was not influenced by the security deposit. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the order imposing service tax, allowing the appeal and granting the appellant relief in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 06:36:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 256 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371487</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that notional interest on a security deposit should not be added to the monthly rent for the purpose of service tax calculation on renting of immovable property. The lease agreement was executed before renting became a taxable service, and the fixed monthly rent was not influenced by the security deposit. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the order imposing service tax, allowing the appeal and granting the appellant relief in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>