<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 254 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the service provider in appeals against Order-in-Appeal dated 04.03.2011 and 29.01.2014, setting aside the demands and penalties imposed by the Revenue for Service Tax. The Tribunal found the show cause notices unsustainable due to limitation issues and duplication of periods already addressed, ultimately dismissing the appeal filed by the Revenue and allowing the appeals filed by the service provider. The judgment was pronounced on 20.11.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 06:35:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 254 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the service provider in appeals against Order-in-Appeal dated 04.03.2011 and 29.01.2014, setting aside the demands and penalties imposed by the Revenue for Service Tax. The Tribunal found the show cause notices unsustainable due to limitation issues and duplication of periods already addressed, ultimately dismissing the appeal filed by the Revenue and allowing the appeals filed by the service provider. The judgment was pronounced on 20.11.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>