<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 252 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal demanding service tax for a Technology Transfer Agreement, ruling that the appellants, as manufacturers, did not provide Scientific or Technical Consultancy services as per the Finance Act. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s claim unsustainable, noting the appellants&#039; lack of qualification as technocrats or scientific institutions. The appeal was allowed, overturning the demand for service tax and penalty upheld by the Original Authority and Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 06:35:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 252 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal demanding service tax for a Technology Transfer Agreement, ruling that the appellants, as manufacturers, did not provide Scientific or Technical Consultancy services as per the Finance Act. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s claim unsustainable, noting the appellants&#039; lack of qualification as technocrats or scientific institutions. The appeal was allowed, overturning the demand for service tax and penalty upheld by the Original Authority and Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>