<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 11 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15555</link>
    <description>A hotel building used for lodging, boarding, restaurant and bar facilities can be treated as &quot;plant&quot; for depreciation purposes under the Income-tax Act, 1961 where the asset functions as an essential tool of the business. Applying the broad meaning of &quot;plant&quot;, the hotel premises were held to fall within that concept, and higher-rate depreciation was available to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:22:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 11 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15555</link>
      <description>A hotel building used for lodging, boarding, restaurant and bar facilities can be treated as &quot;plant&quot; for depreciation purposes under the Income-tax Act, 1961 where the asset functions as an essential tool of the business. Applying the broad meaning of &quot;plant&quot;, the hotel premises were held to fall within that concept, and higher-rate depreciation was available to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>