<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 236 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371467</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD set aside the Revenue Authorities&#039; denial of Cenvat credit to the appellant for availing credit based on Railway Receipts (RRs) instead of STTG certificates. The Tribunal deemed the denial unjustified, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s compliance with legal requirements by later producing the necessary STTG certificates. The Tribunal also upheld the applicability of Circular No. 1048/36/2016-CX retrospectively, allowing the consignee to rightfully claim the credit when the consignor did not avail it. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, providing relief from the demand, interest, and penalty imposed by the Revenue Authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 06:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 236 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371467</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD set aside the Revenue Authorities&#039; denial of Cenvat credit to the appellant for availing credit based on Railway Receipts (RRs) instead of STTG certificates. The Tribunal deemed the denial unjustified, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s compliance with legal requirements by later producing the necessary STTG certificates. The Tribunal also upheld the applicability of Circular No. 1048/36/2016-CX retrospectively, allowing the consignee to rightfully claim the credit when the consignor did not avail it. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, providing relief from the demand, interest, and penalty imposed by the Revenue Authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>