<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1929 (12) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277463</link>
    <description>Misdescription of the respondent authority did not defeat the petition where the substance of the challenge and the concerned department were clear, so the objection to maintainability failed. The article also states that certiorari was treated as unavailable against the Governor acting with Ministers in respect of an order on a transferred subject, because the historical statutory exemption from the High Court&#039;s original jurisdiction continued to apply to acts done in public capacity. On that basis, the writ remedy was held not to extend to such orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 18:35:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1929 (12) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277463</link>
      <description>Misdescription of the respondent authority did not defeat the petition where the substance of the challenge and the concerned department were clear, so the objection to maintainability failed. The article also states that certiorari was treated as unavailable against the Governor acting with Ministers in respect of an order on a transferred subject, because the historical statutory exemption from the High Court&#039;s original jurisdiction continued to apply to acts done in public capacity. On that basis, the writ remedy was held not to extend to such orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>