https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277461 A writ proceeding under Article 226 challenging an administrative order was treated as original civil jurisdiction for Letters Patent purposes, so a Clause 15 appeal lay against the single Judge's order. In permit revision under Section 64-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, the Government could consider the applicant's existing transport permits and broader public-interest factors relevant under Section 47, as those considerations were not excluded by Section 57 and the statutory list was not exhaustive. A later transfer of one permit did not invalidate the order, because legality was tested at the time of the authority's decision. The Government's interference was upheld. en-us Thu, 30 Aug 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Dec 2018 18:18:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277461 A writ proceeding under Article 226 challenging an administrative order was treated as original civil jurisdiction for Letters Patent purposes, so a Clause 15 appeal lay against the single Judge's order. In permit revision under Section 64-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, the Government could consider the applicant's existing transport permits and broader public-interest factors relevant under Section 47, as those considerations were not excluded by Section 57 and the statutory list was not exhaustive. A later transfer of one permit did not invalidate the order, because legality was tested at the time of the authority's decision. The Government's interference was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Aug 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277461