https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277456 Appellate jurisdiction under the Letters Patent was held to remain available against a single Judge's Article 226 order where the Judge acted within the High Court's rule-making and business-allocation framework, and the appeal was treated as within the relevant limitation period, with delay condoned. On the municipal law issue, a resolution and notice cancelling or refusing licences for slaughter and beef sale were invalid only to the extent they exceeded the applicable statutory scheme or obstructed consideration of renewal applications. The municipality retained power to close the slaughter-house, so the resolution was not wholly void. Relief was therefore granted only in part, with the directions concerning the notice and renewal applications maintained. en-us Wed, 10 Sep 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Dec 2018 17:32:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277456 Appellate jurisdiction under the Letters Patent was held to remain available against a single Judge's Article 226 order where the Judge acted within the High Court's rule-making and business-allocation framework, and the appeal was treated as within the relevant limitation period, with delay condoned. On the municipal law issue, a resolution and notice cancelling or refusing licences for slaughter and beef sale were invalid only to the extent they exceeded the applicable statutory scheme or obstructed consideration of renewal applications. The municipality retained power to close the slaughter-house, so the resolution was not wholly void. Relief was therefore granted only in part, with the directions concerning the notice and renewal applications maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Sep 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277456