https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277429 The High Court upheld the decision that the property in question was a debottar property, dismissing the appeal. The appellants failed to provide enough evidence to challenge this finding, leading to the court directing compensation from land acquisition for the deity's maintenance. The court emphasized the importance of clear evidence of endowment in debottar cases and factual considerations in determining dedication status. The judgment highlights the complexities in such property determinations and the necessity of factual evidence in establishing property nature. en-us Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Dec 2018 09:48:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277429 The High Court upheld the decision that the property in question was a debottar property, dismissing the appeal. The appellants failed to provide enough evidence to challenge this finding, leading to the court directing compensation from land acquisition for the deity's maintenance. The court emphasized the importance of clear evidence of endowment in debottar cases and factual considerations in determining dedication status. The judgment highlights the complexities in such property determinations and the necessity of factual evidence in establishing property nature. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277429