<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 227 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371458</link>
    <description>The commission received by M/s. Micro Instruments for intermediary services was not classified as an &quot;export of services&quot; under the IGST Act, 2017, and did not qualify for zero-rated tax. The supply of services by M/s. Micro Instruments was deemed an inter-state supply, attracting IGST at the rate of 18%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 227 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371458</link>
      <description>The commission received by M/s. Micro Instruments for intermediary services was not classified as an &quot;export of services&quot; under the IGST Act, 2017, and did not qualify for zero-rated tax. The supply of services by M/s. Micro Instruments was deemed an inter-state supply, attracting IGST at the rate of 18%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>