<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 226 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371457</link>
    <description>The case involved the applicability of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on the sale of goods located outside India and the eligibility of the recipient to avail input tax credit. The Authority ruled that the sale of goods located outside India is not liable to tax under section 7(5)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017. Consequently, the question of the recipient&#039;s eligibility to avail input tax credit was deemed irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 226 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371457</link>
      <description>The case involved the applicability of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on the sale of goods located outside India and the eligibility of the recipient to avail input tax credit. The Authority ruled that the sale of goods located outside India is not liable to tax under section 7(5)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017. Consequently, the question of the recipient&#039;s eligibility to avail input tax credit was deemed irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>