<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 223 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371454</link>
    <description>Validity of notice under Income-tax Act s.153A turned on whether a &quot;search is initiated&quot; u/s 132 in the noticee&#039;s case, since mere issuance of search authorisation is insufficient given the statutory distinction between authorisation and actual conduct of search. However, where search was in fact conducted at multiple premises connected with a partnership firm, and no provision prima facie confined search action to the firm&#039;s registered office, the HC held that the factual nexus and objections should be examined by the AO, consistent with SC guidance against writ interference at show-cause stage. The writ was disposed by relegating the assessee to the AO without quashing the notices, keeping all contentions open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 223 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371454</link>
      <description>Validity of notice under Income-tax Act s.153A turned on whether a &quot;search is initiated&quot; u/s 132 in the noticee&#039;s case, since mere issuance of search authorisation is insufficient given the statutory distinction between authorisation and actual conduct of search. However, where search was in fact conducted at multiple premises connected with a partnership firm, and no provision prima facie confined search action to the firm&#039;s registered office, the HC held that the factual nexus and objections should be examined by the AO, consistent with SC guidance against writ interference at show-cause stage. The writ was disposed by relegating the assessee to the AO without quashing the notices, keeping all contentions open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>