<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 32 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15539</link>
    <description>Under the mercantile system, gratuity liability must be assessed on an actuarial basis, and a deduction is available only for liability actually accrued or properly provided for in the accounts. The Tribunal erred by comparing valuation figures without accounting for the accepted liability carried forward from the earlier year, and there was no material showing that the amount paid during the year represented a separate liability outside the actuarial provision or that any accrued liability had been omitted from the current year valuation. On those facts, the assessee was not entitled to deduct the claimed gratuity amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:51:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 32 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15539</link>
      <description>Under the mercantile system, gratuity liability must be assessed on an actuarial basis, and a deduction is available only for liability actually accrued or properly provided for in the accounts. The Tribunal erred by comparing valuation figures without accounting for the accepted liability carried forward from the earlier year, and there was no material showing that the amount paid during the year represented a separate liability outside the actuarial provision or that any accrued liability had been omitted from the current year valuation. On those facts, the assessee was not entitled to deduct the claimed gratuity amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>