<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 215 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371446</link>
    <description>The Court held that the assessee was liable to pay penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty. The Court found the explanations for delayed deductions unsatisfactory and noted deliberate laxity on the part of the assessee. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, restoring the penalties imposed by the Assessing Authority and the Appellate Authority. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 215 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371446</link>
      <description>The Court held that the assessee was liable to pay penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty. The Court found the explanations for delayed deductions unsatisfactory and noted deliberate laxity on the part of the assessee. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, restoring the penalties imposed by the Assessing Authority and the Appellate Authority. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>