<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 213 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371444</link>
    <description>Possession handed over under a written agreement for sale can amount to a transfer for capital gains purposes where the arrangement falls within section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act and section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act. The later rescission of the contract does not remove the tax incidence for the year in which the transfer occurred. A subsequent registration requirement under section 17(1A) of the Registration Act does not alter that result where the agreement predated the amendment, as the provision was treated as non-retrospective. The capital gains charge therefore arises on the basis of part performance and delivery of possession, subject to computation under section 48.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2018 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 213 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371444</link>
      <description>Possession handed over under a written agreement for sale can amount to a transfer for capital gains purposes where the arrangement falls within section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act and section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act. The later rescission of the contract does not remove the tax incidence for the year in which the transfer occurred. A subsequent registration requirement under section 17(1A) of the Registration Act does not alter that result where the agreement predated the amendment, as the provision was treated as non-retrospective. The capital gains charge therefore arises on the basis of part performance and delivery of possession, subject to computation under section 48.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>