<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 207 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowing the assessee&#039;s cross objections. It affirmed that depreciation on fixed assets, repayment of term loans, and surplus funds from commercial activities were valid under Section 11. The Tribunal directed the full allowance of counseling expenses, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s 50% disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 09:00:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 207 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowing the assessee&#039;s cross objections. It affirmed that depreciation on fixed assets, repayment of term loans, and surplus funds from commercial activities were valid under Section 11. The Tribunal directed the full allowance of counseling expenses, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s 50% disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>