<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 199 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371430</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting both the addition of Rs. 37,03,514/- towards unexplained cash credit under Section 68 and the addition of Rs. 11,250/- towards unexplained expenditure on commission. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of concrete evidence over mere suspicion in tax assessments, citing precedents that favored the assessee in similar situations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 09:00:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 199 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371430</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting both the addition of Rs. 37,03,514/- towards unexplained cash credit under Section 68 and the addition of Rs. 11,250/- towards unexplained expenditure on commission. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of concrete evidence over mere suspicion in tax assessments, citing precedents that favored the assessee in similar situations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>