<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 193 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s order. It held that deductions under Section 80-IC should be 100% for the first five years and 25% for the next five years, aligning with statutory provisions and Supreme Court precedent. The Tribunal emphasized the need to adhere to the prescribed deduction percentages and rejected interpretations deviating from the established legal framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 08:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 193 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s order. It held that deductions under Section 80-IC should be 100% for the first five years and 25% for the next five years, aligning with statutory provisions and Supreme Court precedent. The Tribunal emphasized the need to adhere to the prescribed deduction percentages and rejected interpretations deviating from the established legal framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>