<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 183 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371414</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the disallowance of 12.5% of bogus purchases, confirming the validity of reopening the assessment based on information from the Investigation Wing. The purchases were deemed non-genuine due to lack of evidence and non-existence of suppliers, supported by precedents from higher courts. The ITAT dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of tangible information for reopening assessments and the need for concrete evidence to substantiate transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 183 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371414</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the disallowance of 12.5% of bogus purchases, confirming the validity of reopening the assessment based on information from the Investigation Wing. The purchases were deemed non-genuine due to lack of evidence and non-existence of suppliers, supported by precedents from higher courts. The ITAT dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of tangible information for reopening assessments and the need for concrete evidence to substantiate transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>