<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 179 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371410</link>
    <description>The CIT(A) deleted the addition of Rs. 81,50,175/- made by the AO, finding the cash deposits were legitimate sales proceeds properly recorded. No violation of Rule 46A as all necessary documents were on record. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 08:59:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 179 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371410</link>
      <description>The CIT(A) deleted the addition of Rs. 81,50,175/- made by the AO, finding the cash deposits were legitimate sales proceeds properly recorded. No violation of Rule 46A as all necessary documents were on record. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>