https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371409 A consortium arrangement was treated as the operative contracting entity, not as separate members acting independently, because the contract and consortium agreement showed the project was undertaken through a lead-member structure with central management and control in India. A foreign-incorporated member did not, by itself, make the dispute an international commercial arbitration under Section 2(1)(f)(ii); the consortium instead fell within the category of an association under Section 2(1)(f)(iii). The petition under Section 11 was therefore not maintainable as an international commercial arbitration petition, and the parties were required to proceed only as a consortium. en-us Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Dec 2018 08:59:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371409 A consortium arrangement was treated as the operative contracting entity, not as separate members acting independently, because the contract and consortium agreement showed the project was undertaken through a lead-member structure with central management and control in India. A foreign-incorporated member did not, by itself, make the dispute an international commercial arbitration under Section 2(1)(f)(ii); the consortium instead fell within the category of an association under Section 2(1)(f)(iii). The petition under Section 11 was therefore not maintainable as an international commercial arbitration petition, and the parties were required to proceed only as a consortium. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371409