https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371395 The appeal was partly allowed, with certain demands upheld, including contraventions of Rule 9(5) and Rule 10 of the Cenvat Credit Rules and Central Excise Rules. The contravention of Rule 16 regarding non-receipt of processed materials from job work was confirmed. However, the penalty under Section 11AC was dropped as there was no evidence of intentional evasion. The issue of verifying raw materials from the job worker was remanded for further examination. en-us Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Dec 2018 08:58:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371395 The appeal was partly allowed, with certain demands upheld, including contraventions of Rule 9(5) and Rule 10 of the Cenvat Credit Rules and Central Excise Rules. The contravention of Rule 16 regarding non-receipt of processed materials from job work was confirmed. However, the penalty under Section 11AC was dropped as there was no evidence of intentional evasion. The issue of verifying raw materials from the job worker was remanded for further examination. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371395