<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 163 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371394</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the demand of interest to the extent of Rs. 12,963 but set aside the penalty under Rule 15(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s timely reversal of credit and the absence of intent to evade duty, aligning with relevant legal precedents and interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 08:57:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 163 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371394</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the demand of interest to the extent of Rs. 12,963 but set aside the penalty under Rule 15(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s timely reversal of credit and the absence of intent to evade duty, aligning with relevant legal precedents and interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>