<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 156 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371387</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders against the appellants and allowed the appeals with consequential relief, emphasizing that High Courts&#039; decisions should be followed until the Supreme Court provides a definitive ruling, despite the stay granted on the High Courts&#039; decisions. The case involved default in duty payment under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and the constitutionality of Rule 8(3A), with the Tribunal upholding the decisions of various High Courts declaring the rule unconstitutional.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 08:57:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 156 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371387</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders against the appellants and allowed the appeals with consequential relief, emphasizing that High Courts&#039; decisions should be followed until the Supreme Court provides a definitive ruling, despite the stay granted on the High Courts&#039; decisions. The case involved default in duty payment under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and the constitutionality of Rule 8(3A), with the Tribunal upholding the decisions of various High Courts declaring the rule unconstitutional.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>