https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371386 The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders against the appellants, allowing the appeals with consequential relief. The decision was based on the precedent set by the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court declaring Rule 8(3A) unconstitutional, which was followed by various High Courts and the Tribunal. Despite Revenue's challenge in the Supreme Court with a stay order, the Tribunal upheld the decisions citing the reasoning of the judgments, granting relief to the appellants for default in duty payment under Rule 8 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. en-us Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Dec 2018 08:57:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371386 The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders against the appellants, allowing the appeals with consequential relief. The decision was based on the precedent set by the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court declaring Rule 8(3A) unconstitutional, which was followed by various High Courts and the Tribunal. Despite Revenue's challenge in the Supreme Court with a stay order, the Tribunal upheld the decisions citing the reasoning of the judgments, granting relief to the appellants for default in duty payment under Rule 8 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371386