<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1474 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277419</link>
    <description>The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions to the TPO for fresh adjudication on several issues, while the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed. The tribunal emphasized consistency in treatment across different years and the necessity of rational and cogent reasons for rejecting the assessee&#039;s benchmarking methods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 08:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1474 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277419</link>
      <description>The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions to the TPO for fresh adjudication on several issues, while the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed. The tribunal emphasized consistency in treatment across different years and the necessity of rational and cogent reasons for rejecting the assessee&#039;s benchmarking methods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>