https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277412 In second appeal, the court may examine the legal effect of facts found by the lower appellate court, but not reappraise those facts themselves; on that basis, jurisdiction was upheld because the challenge concerned legal inference rather than factual dispute. On liability, mere knowledge of a mortgage or statements that the debt was repayable did not amount to ratification or a binding agreement by Daud Rao, where the mortgage was not executed in his name or on his behalf. He was therefore not made liable for the whole mortgage debt or subjected to foreclosure against his share, save to the limited extent accepted by the Judicial Commissioner. en-us Sat, 23 Jul 1892 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 18:37:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277412 In second appeal, the court may examine the legal effect of facts found by the lower appellate court, but not reappraise those facts themselves; on that basis, jurisdiction was upheld because the challenge concerned legal inference rather than factual dispute. On liability, mere knowledge of a mortgage or statements that the debt was repayable did not amount to ratification or a binding agreement by Daud Rao, where the mortgage was not executed in his name or on his behalf. He was therefore not made liable for the whole mortgage debt or subjected to foreclosure against his share, save to the limited extent accepted by the Judicial Commissioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 23 Jul 1892 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277412