https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277411 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 was upheld where the first respondent carried on official functions within the State, his office was at Trivandrum, and the impugned action emanated from within the Court's limits, so effective relief could be granted against him. The Travancore Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1124 was treated as an existing law continued by Article 372(1) and the Travancore-Cochin Administration and Application of Laws Ordinance, 1124, and was capable of sustaining the Commission's proceedings. However, the Commission could not enlarge its inquiry beyond the years and matters covered by the original reference, because the statute authorised only the limited reference actually made. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 17:56:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277411 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 was upheld where the first respondent carried on official functions within the State, his office was at Trivandrum, and the impugned action emanated from within the Court's limits, so effective relief could be granted against him. The Travancore Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1124 was treated as an existing law continued by Article 372(1) and the Travancore-Cochin Administration and Application of Laws Ordinance, 1124, and was capable of sustaining the Commission's proceedings. However, the Commission could not enlarge its inquiry beyond the years and matters covered by the original reference, because the statute authorised only the limited reference actually made. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 08 Sep 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277411