<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (10) TMI 40 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277409</link>
    <description>Article 226 writ jurisdiction depends on the territorial location of the authority against whom relief is sought, and a High Court cannot issue a writ to an appellate tribunal permanently seated outside its territorial limits. Where an appellate tribunal&#039;s award substitutes and becomes enforceable in place of the industrial court&#039;s order, quashing only the industrial court&#039;s order would amount to indirect interference with the appellate order and could create conflicting obligations. On that basis, the High Court held that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition or to quash the impugned orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 17:02:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (10) TMI 40 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277409</link>
      <description>Article 226 writ jurisdiction depends on the territorial location of the authority against whom relief is sought, and a High Court cannot issue a writ to an appellate tribunal permanently seated outside its territorial limits. Where an appellate tribunal&#039;s award substitutes and becomes enforceable in place of the industrial court&#039;s order, quashing only the industrial court&#039;s order would amount to indirect interference with the appellate order and could create conflicting obligations. On that basis, the High Court held that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition or to quash the impugned orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>