https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277401 The Federal Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant's actions as a station master at the steamer station did not constitute acts done in the execution of his duty as a servant of the Crown. The court found that the appellant's refusal to issue tickets and engaging in abusive behavior towards the complainant and companions did not align with the requirements of Section 270(1) of the Constitution Act, thus denying him protection under the law. The court emphasized that the defense raised based on Railways Act provisions and Railway Traffic Manual rules was insufficient to establish the appellant's actions as falling within the scope of duty. en-us Fri, 09 Nov 1945 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 15:06:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277401 The Federal Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant's actions as a station master at the steamer station did not constitute acts done in the execution of his duty as a servant of the Crown. The court found that the appellant's refusal to issue tickets and engaging in abusive behavior towards the complainant and companions did not align with the requirements of Section 270(1) of the Constitution Act, thus denying him protection under the law. The court emphasized that the defense raised based on Railways Act provisions and Railway Traffic Manual rules was insufficient to establish the appellant's actions as falling within the scope of duty. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Nov 1945 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277401