https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277400 The court quashed the convictions and sentences of both appellants due to misdirection and non-direction in the jury charge and the absence of necessary sanction for the second accused. The appellants were discharged, not acquitted, with the government having the option to pursue further proceedings. The first accused's fine was to be refunded, and the bail bond of the second accused was canceled. en-us Wed, 22 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 15:00:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277400 The court quashed the convictions and sentences of both appellants due to misdirection and non-direction in the jury charge and the absence of necessary sanction for the second accused. The appellants were discharged, not acquitted, with the government having the option to pursue further proceedings. The first accused's fine was to be refunded, and the bail bond of the second accused was canceled. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277400