https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277399 The Federal Court affirmed its jurisdiction over criminal appeals, interpreting "judgment" broadly to include criminal cases. It clarified that final orders dispose of parties' rights, distinguishing them from interlocutory orders. Regarding the Governor's consent for prosecuting public servants, acts purportedly done in the execution of duty, even dishonestly, fall under protection. The court found the joint trial valid for Section 409 but quashed proceedings for Section 477-A due to lack of consent. The case was remanded for rehearing on Section 409, with potential retrial if prejudice occurred. The judgment underscores fair legal proceedings for public servants. en-us Wed, 12 Apr 1939 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 14:46:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277399 The Federal Court affirmed its jurisdiction over criminal appeals, interpreting "judgment" broadly to include criminal cases. It clarified that final orders dispose of parties' rights, distinguishing them from interlocutory orders. Regarding the Governor's consent for prosecuting public servants, acts purportedly done in the execution of duty, even dishonestly, fall under protection. The court found the joint trial valid for Section 409 but quashed proceedings for Section 477-A due to lack of consent. The case was remanded for rehearing on Section 409, with potential retrial if prejudice occurred. The judgment underscores fair legal proceedings for public servants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Apr 1939 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277399