https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277394 The High Court initially ruled in favor of the Plaintiffs, awarding damages. However, the Privy Council reversed the judgment, holding that the Defendant's order was not wrongful but in the public interest to regulate towage services. The Privy Council found the Defendant's actions justified and emphasized the Government's right to regulate pilot terms. Therefore, the Plaintiffs' claim was dismissed, and they were ordered to bear the costs of the appeal. en-us Thu, 28 Jun 1860 00:00:00 +0553 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 13:10:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277394 The High Court initially ruled in favor of the Plaintiffs, awarding damages. However, the Privy Council reversed the judgment, holding that the Defendant's order was not wrongful but in the public interest to regulate towage services. The Privy Council found the Defendant's actions justified and emphasized the Government's right to regulate pilot terms. Therefore, the Plaintiffs' claim was dismissed, and they were ordered to bear the costs of the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jun 1860 00:00:00 +0553 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277394