https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277393 The Privy Council reversed the High Court's decision in a land dispute case involving construction near a tidal creek. Despite the Plaintiff's claims of obstruction and damage, the Council found insufficient evidence of harm to support the requested removal of the Defendant's wall. Upholding the Subordinate Judge's ruling, the Council emphasized the lack of proven damage or injury to the Plaintiff's property or riparian rights. Costs were awarded to the Appellant, concluding that the Plaintiff failed to establish grounds for the wall's removal due to the absence of tangible harm or obstruction. en-us Wed, 11 Jun 1879 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:57:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277393 The Privy Council reversed the High Court's decision in a land dispute case involving construction near a tidal creek. Despite the Plaintiff's claims of obstruction and damage, the Council found insufficient evidence of harm to support the requested removal of the Defendant's wall. Upholding the Subordinate Judge's ruling, the Council emphasized the lack of proven damage or injury to the Plaintiff's property or riparian rights. Costs were awarded to the Appellant, concluding that the Plaintiff failed to establish grounds for the wall's removal due to the absence of tangible harm or obstruction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Jun 1879 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277393