<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1936 (5) TMI 32 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277391</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the plaintiff&#039;s suit, holding that the Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction to determine the plaintiff&#039;s residence and assess income in British India. The court found the assessment was made in accordance with the law, and therefore, the suit was barred by Section 67 of the Income-tax Act, XI of 1922. The plaintiff&#039;s appeal was denied, and costs were awarded against the plaintiff.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:33:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1936 (5) TMI 32 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277391</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the plaintiff&#039;s suit, holding that the Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction to determine the plaintiff&#039;s residence and assess income in British India. The court found the assessment was made in accordance with the law, and therefore, the suit was barred by Section 67 of the Income-tax Act, XI of 1922. The plaintiff&#039;s appeal was denied, and costs were awarded against the plaintiff.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>