<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1121 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277388</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal regarding age relaxation for disabled persons in employment, noting the absence of a mandatory provision for such relaxation under the Disabilities Act. The Court emphasized that State Government Orders withdrawing age relaxation were legally valid, despite being retrograde actions. The Appellant failed to provide sufficient legal basis for claiming age relaxation, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and an order to pay costs to Respondent No. 1.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1121 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277388</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal regarding age relaxation for disabled persons in employment, noting the absence of a mandatory provision for such relaxation under the Disabilities Act. The Court emphasized that State Government Orders withdrawing age relaxation were legally valid, despite being retrograde actions. The Appellant failed to provide sufficient legal basis for claiming age relaxation, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and an order to pay costs to Respondent No. 1.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>