<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (3) TMI 77 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277386</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s decree and restoring the District Judge&#039;s decree with costs throughout. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the limits prescribed by Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, stating that justice according to law must prevail over considerations of equity and fair play.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:01:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (3) TMI 77 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277386</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s decree and restoring the District Judge&#039;s decree with costs throughout. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the limits prescribed by Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, stating that justice according to law must prevail over considerations of equity and fair play.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>