https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277383 The Court upheld the validity of the order dated 15 June, 2009, directing reconsideration of M.R Distributorship applications at Bhupatinagar filed before 1 June, 2005. It found the Directorate's decision on financial solvency to be without jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to disclose a relevant letter. The Court applied the principle of estoppel, barring the appellant from challenging the order after seeking its implementation. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the eligibility criteria based on documents submitted by 1 June, 2005, as per the earlier order dated 14 June, 2007. en-us Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 11:30:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277383 The Court upheld the validity of the order dated 15 June, 2009, directing reconsideration of M.R Distributorship applications at Bhupatinagar filed before 1 June, 2005. It found the Directorate's decision on financial solvency to be without jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to disclose a relevant letter. The Court applied the principle of estoppel, barring the appellant from challenging the order after seeking its implementation. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the eligibility criteria based on documents submitted by 1 June, 2005, as per the earlier order dated 14 June, 2007. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277383