https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277382 A saving provision in a later municipal enactment required pending or related contravention proceedings to follow the later procedural scheme, so the Building Tribunal was treated as properly constituted for the demolition appeal. Because the objection to its composition was not raised at the earliest stage and could have been cured before the Tribunal, the challenge to the Tribunal's constitution was untenable. The High Court should not have used writ jurisdiction to disturb that decision where the objection was delayed and lacked merit. The appeal succeeded, the writ petition was dismissed, and the Tribunal's order was restored. en-us Thu, 03 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 11:21:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277382 A saving provision in a later municipal enactment required pending or related contravention proceedings to follow the later procedural scheme, so the Building Tribunal was treated as properly constituted for the demolition appeal. Because the objection to its composition was not raised at the earliest stage and could have been cured before the Tribunal, the challenge to the Tribunal's constitution was untenable. The High Court should not have used writ jurisdiction to disturb that decision where the objection was delayed and lacked merit. The appeal succeeded, the writ petition was dismissed, and the Tribunal's order was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277382