<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1926 (11) TMI 4 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277373</link>
    <description>A statutory demand must be a formal demand executed &#039;under the hand&#039; of the creditor or otherwise meet the statute&#039;s formal requirements, and must be made when the company is actually in default; solicitor demand letters or a manager&#039;s contemporaneous letter served before presentment completion do not satisfy this requirement, so they do not trigger the statutory three week consequence. Separately, reliance on a company&#039;s balance sheet or unpleaded material cannot conclusively establish inability to pay; absence of pleaded proof of insolvency prevents sustaining a compulsory winding up. Consequence: petition dismissed for defective demand and insufficient proof of inability to pay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 1926 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 10:23:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1926 (11) TMI 4 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277373</link>
      <description>A statutory demand must be a formal demand executed &#039;under the hand&#039; of the creditor or otherwise meet the statute&#039;s formal requirements, and must be made when the company is actually in default; solicitor demand letters or a manager&#039;s contemporaneous letter served before presentment completion do not satisfy this requirement, so they do not trigger the statutory three week consequence. Separately, reliance on a company&#039;s balance sheet or unpleaded material cannot conclusively establish inability to pay; absence of pleaded proof of insolvency prevents sustaining a compulsory winding up. Consequence: petition dismissed for defective demand and insufficient proof of inability to pay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 1926 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>