<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 138 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371369</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the legality of the detention notices and requiring the transporter petitioner to comply with Section 129(1)(b) for the release of goods. The Court emphasized that being a transporter did not exempt the petitioner from following Section 129 provisions and allowed the petitioner to present a defense before the State Tax Officer regarding the detention issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 138 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371369</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the legality of the detention notices and requiring the transporter petitioner to comply with Section 129(1)(b) for the release of goods. The Court emphasized that being a transporter did not exempt the petitioner from following Section 129 provisions and allowed the petitioner to present a defense before the State Tax Officer regarding the detention issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>