<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 130 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371361</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the reassessment notice dated 31.03.2018 and its proceedings, finding it impermissible as it solely relied on an audit opinion, constituting a change of opinion. The court stressed the requirement for tangible material to justify reassessment, emphasizing that mere reliance on audit reports is insufficient. Compliance with Accounting Standards and full disclosure of material facts by the assessee were underscored to avoid reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 130 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371361</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the reassessment notice dated 31.03.2018 and its proceedings, finding it impermissible as it solely relied on an audit opinion, constituting a change of opinion. The court stressed the requirement for tangible material to justify reassessment, emphasizing that mere reliance on audit reports is insufficient. Compliance with Accounting Standards and full disclosure of material facts by the assessee were underscored to avoid reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>