<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 119 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371350</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to impose a penalty of Rs. 10,58,313 under section 271C for failure to deduct TDS. The appellant&#039;s argument of ongoing litigation and bonafide belief was not accepted, emphasizing that penalty under section 271C is applicable in the absence of a reasonable cause for non-deduction of TDS. Despite the appellant being a sick company and adding back amounts without deduction of tax, the Tribunal affirmed the penalty, stating that failure to deduct tax at source attracts penalty under the section, regardless of a bonafide belief. The appeal was dismissed, and the penalty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 09:06:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 119 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371350</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to impose a penalty of Rs. 10,58,313 under section 271C for failure to deduct TDS. The appellant&#039;s argument of ongoing litigation and bonafide belief was not accepted, emphasizing that penalty under section 271C is applicable in the absence of a reasonable cause for non-deduction of TDS. Despite the appellant being a sick company and adding back amounts without deduction of tax, the Tribunal affirmed the penalty, stating that failure to deduct tax at source attracts penalty under the section, regardless of a bonafide belief. The appeal was dismissed, and the penalty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>