<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 106 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371337</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of depreciation, as the appellant demonstrated possession and use of the property for business. The ITAT also allowed the Cross Objection, overturning the disallowance under section 14A, as investments were made from surplus funds, not for earning exempt income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 09:04:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 106 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371337</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of depreciation, as the appellant demonstrated possession and use of the property for business. The ITAT also allowed the Cross Objection, overturning the disallowance under section 14A, as investments were made from surplus funds, not for earning exempt income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>