https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371328 The High Court allowed the applications for re-admission of appeals filed under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appeals being decided on merits, the Court found the explanation for non-appearance of counsel sufficient and granted re-admission under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court emphasized the applicability of procedural provisions to appeal proceedings under the Central Excise Act and relied on legal principles from a previous judgment to support the decision for re-admission, directing the appeals to be re-admitted for further hearing. en-us Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 09:02:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371328 The High Court allowed the applications for re-admission of appeals filed under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appeals being decided on merits, the Court found the explanation for non-appearance of counsel sufficient and granted re-admission under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court emphasized the applicability of procedural provisions to appeal proceedings under the Central Excise Act and relied on legal principles from a previous judgment to support the decision for re-admission, directing the appeals to be re-admitted for further hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371328